To develop antibiotics, scientists have had to study a lot of fungi. They've had to look at
molds that produce penicillin and actinomycetes that produce
drugs like nystatin. They've also had
to study the fungi that drugs like nystatin are used to kill. No doubt, mycology is at the heart
of antibiotic science, and fungi were often under the microscopes of the notable scientists
we've read about in this module.
In the late 1800s, fungi were the passion of a young woman by the name of Beatrix Potter.
Living in England, she wasn't formally trained as a scientist, but learned mycology working as
a scientific illustrator. At first drawing and painting incredibly accurate and detailed
pictures of fungi for a naturalist named Charles McIntosh, Potter eventually became
knowledgeable enough to conduct her own investigations and experiments, and began to formulate
some of her own theories.
While technically an amateur, Potter's work was on the cutting edge of mycology at the time.
In the late 1890s science was wrestling with the nature of lichens. Potter studied them
intensely, and became fascinated with an idea coming from mycologists on the European continent.
A new theory proposed that a lichen wasn't one living thing, but two, an alga and a fungus
living intermingled with one another. The idea was scoffed at in Potter's country, though.
But Potter read the works of continental scientists. Some thought the alga and the fungus in
a lichen were a parasite and a host. But Potter was drawn to the idea that the lichen was a
symbiotic life form, that is, two organisms helped and needed each other to survive. She didn't
invent this notion, but Potter set out to put this idea to the test. She learned a good deal
about the relationship between the alga and the fungus. Algae contain chlorophyll and can
photosynthesize glucose from carbon dioxide and water. This glucose provides food for both the
alga and the fungus. The fungus, on the other hand, was very effective at drawing water from the
air, water that both the alga and the fungus need to live, and the very water the alga uses to
photosynthesize glucose. She also noted that some substance
produced by the fungus had antibiotic behavior and protected both the alga and the fungus from
harmful bacteria (although like Alexander Fleming, she didn't seem to think of using these compounds to
fight disease in humans). The two really did seem to depend on each other to survive.
Potter wrote a paper detailing her theories in 1897. But her work was not readily accepted.
There could have been a lot of reasons for this. At the time, women were not expected to work
as scientists, and Potter faced a lot of sexism. What's more, Britain wasn't exactly a hotbed
of mycology at the time. Based on Potter's own journals, the professional scientists she often
dealt with were not the most knowledgeable in the world. Potter the amateur often found herself
battling professionals who were far less informed about current biological discoveries than she
was. They seem to have been slow to accept new ideas, whether from women or men, based on their
rejection of new theories being put forth by continental scientists. This stale intellectual
climate may have contributed to Potter's ideas being overlooked in addition to the sexism of the
day. At any rate, Potter felt she needed to do more research before she could say that she'd
definitely proved her theories, and withdrew her paper.
Now this is the part of the story where one might expect to read that Potter persevered
against all this adversity and overcame the barriers of sexism to become the greatest mycologist
the world has ever seen. We certainly like to tell stories like that, because we want to inspire
yong women with gifts for science to persevere and realize their potential. But Potter's life
took an odd turn at this point that drew her away from science. Potter began her scientific
career as an illustrator. She was incredibly skilled at drawing and painting plants and animals.
She often drew pictures of cute little bunnies and the like for children she knew. Eventually,
she wrote a story to go along with her bunny pictures, and gave it the name The Tale of Peter
Rabbit. The book was a smash hit, of course, and she began a new career writing children's
books, such as The Tale of Mr. Jeremy Fisher, The Story of Miss Moppet, and The
Tale of Two Bad Mice. In these stories Potter's animal characters are delightfully drawn
with the same attention to accuracy and detail as her scientific illustrations, and convey the
same love of the natural world. Her books earned her a fortune, but the demands of her new
career gave her little time for science, and she sadly never returned to her research.
It wasn't until decades after Potter put forth her theories that scientists showed once and
for all that Potter was right about the symbiotic relationship between the algae and the fungi
that make up lichens. Today, many organisms are known to live in symbiotic relationships with
each other. Even humans live in symbiosis with other life forms. We could not live without the
E. coli bacteria that reside in our intestines and help us digest food. So next time
you have a bowl of rabbit stew, if you aren't already thinking about Peter Rabbit, take a moment
to remember the woman who created him, and who grasped before most others the importance of the
symbiosis that allows you to digest that bowl of stew.
For more information, at other Web sites...
Lichens of North America a helpful
resource on lichen biology with many photographs, created by Sylvia and Steven Sharnoff and Dr.
Irwin M. Brodo.