Cancer Chemotherapy A Chemical Needle in a Haystack
Once most drugs came from
plants, like this sarsaparilla
remedy from around 1900.
In the 1960s, scientists discovered that an extract from the bark of the Pacific yew tree could
be used to fight cancer. The substance—Taxol®—is one of the hundreds of naturally
occurring substances that people have used for centuries to treat disease and promote health.
The use of natural products, primarily plant-based substances along with minerals, has a rich
history that includes both the search for cancer's causes and the struggle for medicines to
treat cancer. Until the 20th century, medicine mostly relied on plants, plant extracts, and
other plant products for treatments. The 1900s witnessed the first creations of completely
synthesized
medicines. And yet, decades later, three-fourths of the world's population still primarily rely
on plant use for treating disease. Similarly, many of the pharmaceuticals being created today
are derived from substances discovered in plants.
Paclitaxel, also known as Taxol®.
Nature's Pharmaceuticals: Ancient History
Many of us tend to think of cancer as a disease of our modern age, but people throughout history recognized the uniqueness of some tumors and sought to find treatments for them. Whether physicians in ancient times were able to distinguish
malignant
from
benign
tumors is uncertain, but as early as the first century AD there are references to treatment of
what we know today as cancer tumors. Modern
chemotherapy
has its roots deep in this past.
Colchicine
For example, as early as 300 BC Galangal (Alpinia officinarum), a
root in the ginger family of plants, may have been used to treat skin cancer. According to
Dioscorides, one of the most important figures in the history of Roman medicine, a plant called
red clover (Trifollium pratense) may have been used in the treatment of certain forms of
cancer. Red clover can aid the body to break down and to use—that is, to metabolize—certain
proteins,
and thus have a medical benefit. Dioscorides also recorded the ancient use of a drug made from
the autumn crocus (Colchicum autumnale L.). Centuries later, in 1938, scientists
investigated the autumn crocus and succeeded in isolating cholchicine, an antitumor agent.
Dioscorides
Approximately 80% of Dioscorides' Materia Medica—an encyclopedia of substances used in
medicine—consists of plant medicines, with the remaining treatments divided equally between
medicines from mineral and animal sources. Interestingly, this ancient division closely matches
a 1976 report describing the sources of modern pharmaceuticals as follows: (a)
synthetic
drugs 50%; (b) plants, 25%; (c) minerals, 7%; and (d) animals, 6 %. If we consider that many
modern synthetic drugs were at one time derived from plants, the percentages of Dioscorides are
remarkably similar to today's.
Galen
Galen, who lived around 130 AD, was perhaps the most important ancient Greek physician. He
learned anatomy in Alexandria, Egypt, which was at that time the center of medical learning.
Galen became the most distinguished physician of antiquity after Hippocrates. During the Middle
Ages (from AD 400 to the 1500s), the Islamic Empire, reaching from central Asia to North Africa
and Spain, made significant contributions to medicine. Avicenna, an Arab physician of the late
900s and early 1000s, wrote a vast medical encyclopedia called the Canon of Medicine.
Both Galen and Avicenna described what we know today as malignant tumors. Avicenna is believed
to have used the term onkos (related to our word
"oncology")
and Galen referred to karkinos (related to our word "carcinoma").
A page from Avicenna's Cannon of Medicine.
Historians have identified many substances found in plants that the ancients used as treatments
for tumors. Such plants included the deadly nightshade, also known as belladonna. A source of
several drugs, belladonna's berries can cause violent illness and even death if eaten in large
quantities. Other plant sources included the kermes oak, myrrh, frankincense, nettle, and
figwort. Dioscorides and Galen also described the use of the squirting cucumber (Ecballium
elaterium L.), the Narcissus bulb, the castor bean (Ricinus communis L.), and spurge
for ailments that are today seen as related to cancer. Scientists later investigated many of
these ancient plant sources, and some were found to contain substances that have anticancer
properties. This is the story common to many of the
chemotherapeutic
agents used today and in the past.
More recently, in 1861, Robert Bentley of Kings College, London, noted the antitumor properties
of an extract of the common May apple (Podophyllum peltatum). Scientists soon had the
ability to analyze such "natural products" to determine "active ingredients," the compound or
compounds in the plant responsible for the observed therapeutic properties. In the 1880s,
pharmacologists and chemists thought that in the May apple's active ingredient was
picropodophyllum, a white crystalline solid. These researches isolated the substance and used
it as an antitumor medicine. It was not until 1946 that scientists uncovered that a combination
of substances found in the May apple (picropodophyllum and picropodophyllic acid, called
podophyllotoxin) actually acted against tumors by preventing cells from undergoing complete cell
division. Further, it was not until the 1960s that researchers were able to synthesize
"structural analogues" of podophyllotoxinin the laboratory. These "structural analogues" were
compounds with
molecular
structures similar to the original, naturally occurring substance, but having
stronger powers to prevent cell division. Today, two important cancer chemotherapy drugs,
etopside and teniposide, are based upon the structure of the May apple's podophyllotoxin. The
story of their creation spanned more than a century and involved the contribution of dozens of
researchers working at very different times and in very different places.
First the Causes, Then the Cures: The Causes
Sir John Hill
In 1801, a group of British medical and chemical investigators formed a society for the
investigation of cancer. The questions that this society set out to answer were basic issues in
the understanding of cancer. They asked:
What are the diagnostic signs?
Are there any characteristic changes in a tissue that precede the growth of cancer?
Is cancer inherited?
Is cancer associated with other diseases?
Is it a localized condition?
Is it produced by an unfavorable climate or environment?
Is it ever susceptible of natural cure?
Over 200 years later, chemistry and medical science has found only some of the answers to these
basic questions.
Sir Percival Pott in action.
Across these two centuries, developments in the search for cancer treatments relied upon the
quest for a better scientific understanding of cancer itself. Environmental causes had been
identified in London in the 1700s with Sir John Hill's observation that the use of snuff (a form
of tobacco inhaled through the nose) caused nasal tumors. In 1775, Sir Percival Pott uncovered
the first example of an "occupational cancer" among chimney sweeps. Interestingly, Pott's study
was one of the earliest examples of an "epidemiological" investigation. Epidemiology, the study
of the occurrence of diseases, is one of the key ways in which cancer causes are identified.
Epidemiological studies often involve tracking the health of vast numbers of people and
associating the presence of diseases with certain common elements in the backgrounds and lives
of the afflicted.
With higher than normal cancer
rates, a chimney sweep was
unlucky, as unlucky as could be.
Associating cancers with specific substances as their cause took a major step forward in the
1910s through the work of the Japanese scientist Katsusaburo Yamigiwa. Following the old reports
of cancer in chimney sweeps from the 1700s and new reports from the Danish scientist Johannes
Fibiger that cancer tumors could be induced in a controlled manner within laboratory animals,
Yamigaiwa set out to explore the cancer-causing effects of
coal
tar. He exposed the skin of rabbits to coal tar and after a year observed carcinomas
on the skin, findings that he reported in 1915. Because coal tar was such a complex mixture of
compounds, no specific culprit was found until 1930 when 1,2:5,6-dibenzanthracene became the
first pure compound known to cause cancer. At about the same time, Francis Peyton Rous—a
pathologist at Rockefeller University in New York City—found that he could cause tumors in hens
by injecting them with an extract from tumors of other hens.
Francis Peyton Rous
This led Rous to propose that viruses and viral infections cause some cancers. His work was
largely ignored until the 1950s and 1960s, when it received strong experimental confirmation. In
1966, 50 years after his experiments with hens and their tumors, Rous was awarded the Nobel
Prize in Medicine for his work on virus-caused tumors.
Rudolf Virchow
The concentration upon cells in cancer research, and in the quest for treatments of cancer,
arose following the establishment of the "cell theory" in medicine more generally. Rudolf
Virchow was an important champion of the "cell theory" that indicated diseases arose at the
level of cells and their processes. Virchow was both a prominent scientist and a powerful German
politician. Following Virchow, scientists increasingly began to focus on cells when thinking
about and trying to treat cancer. Surgical removal of cancer cells became much more effective
and safe with the rise of
antisepsis
and
anesthesia
as general surgical practices. The astounding discovery of radiation from radium and X-rays in
the late 1800s not only changed our understanding of the physical world, but gave rise to new
methods for studying cancer's causes and treating cancers. In the late 1920s, H.J. Muller, then
working at the University of Texas, Austin, discovered that radiation could produce changes,
called
mutations,
in the chromosomes within cells. This development opened up new avenues for the study of
genetics and the processes of heredity as well as the
connections among genetics, heredity, and diseases like
cancer. Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1946 for this path-breaking work.
First the Causes, Then the Cures: The Cures
The late 1800s and early 1900s saw an expansion in the scientific work on hormones and their
effects on the body. Hormones are chemicals produced by the body's glands that act to control
the body's processes. It was at this time that scientists first began to uncover a connection
between hormones and cancer. The Scottish surgeon G.T. Beaston noted that breast cancers in
women actually shrunk when he removed their ovaries. The ovaries produce two powerful
hormones—estrogen and progesterone. In the 1930s, Charles B. Huggins, a
Chicago surgeon, showed that cancer of the prostate in dogs could be stalled by castration. He
found the same effect by administering the female hormone estrogen. Establishing these links has
lead eventually to modern hormone therapy for cancer.
U.S. medical personnel
in World War I.
Meanwhile, the deadly mustard gases used first in World War I became the
topic of much research interest. Mustard gas greatly reduced the number of white blood cells in
those unfortunate enough to be exposed to it. The active ingredient in the mustard gas was
dichloroethylsulfide, and it was identified as the cause of the
leukopenia.
Dichloroethylsulfide caused leukopenia by slowing the rate at which white blood cells
reproduced.
dichloroethylsulfide
Researchers eventually realized that if dichloroethylsulfide could affect the rate of white
blood cell division it might also slow the rate of cancer cell division, a rate that was faster
than normal. However, the studies also showed that in addition, exposure to the mustard gases
caused
bone
marrow damage, created nausea and loss of hair, the all-to-common side effects of
chemotherapy. After World War II, scientists began to synthesize analogues (compounds similar in
molecular structure but with quite different properties) of the mustard gas—
dichloroethylsulfide and dichloroethylamines ("nitrogen mustards") as
possible
chemotherapeutics.
By the 1960s these new compounds—mechlorethamine, cycloposhphamide, chlorambucil, and
melphalan—were part of the cancer chemotherapy arsenal, and they are still used today.
mechlorethamine
cyclophosphamide
chlorambucil
melphalan
Other chemotherapy drugs are the descendants—some are quite distant descendants—of an amazing
diversity of compounds and sources. One chemotherapy agent is the descendant of the insecticide
DDT, another is one of a substance found in
coal
tar. Still others are the descendants of a bacterium in the soil, of an evergreen
shrub tea, of the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata, and of the tree Taxis
brevifolia, the Pacific yew. The last is the best known of the "family tree" of
chemotherapeutics—Taxol®—approved for treating ovarian cancer in 1994.
In a long story that began as early as 1869, physicians and researchers from all points on the
globe slowly and erratically began accumulating the information necessary to identify
DNA as the material central to the process of heredity, of
life, and, as it turns out, to diseases like cancer. The many discoveries that marked steps
along this long path are far too numerous to mention, but just after World War II a number of
them arose around one particular chemical compound called folic acid.
folic acid
Scientists studying folic acid
in the 1950s.
Folic acid is a vitamin that plays important roles in the life processes of cells in animals.
Microbes use folic acid as a key ingredient in their growth process. These tiny animals produce
their own folic acid from other compounds called "precursors." The antibiotics known as the
"sulfa drugs”—the sufanilamides—combat microbes by acting upon this process of folic acid
production. The antibiotic is similar in its chemical nature to one of the "precursors" and gets
caught up within the microbes' attempt to produce folic acid. However, unlike the true
precursor, the antibiotic does not allow the chemical reactions to continue, and thus stops the
production of folic acid. Without it, the microbes cannot grow. In other animals, like humans,
folic acid plays an important role in the production of both red and white blood cells and has
been shown to accelerate some types of leukemias. Researchers began trying to make folic acid
analogues, called folic acid antagonists, hoping to inhibit the development of leukemia by
fooling the cells into taking up the modified molecule.
sulfanilamide
Just as microbes use folic acid in the chemical processes of growth, human cells use folic acid
in their chemical processes for producing DNA. If the chemical factory for producing DNA could
be shut down by interfering in the chemical process or "pathway"—as the sulfa drugs had done for
microbes—then the process of cell division and growth could be slowed or even stopped. Such a
drug for altering this chemical pathway would, thus, be a powerful tool in fighting diseases
like cancer that involve cell growth and division. Thus, this folic acid story began the decades
long search for the chemical pathways by which human cells form
nucleic
acids and through which cancer could be treated. These chemical pathways were other
avenues along which chemical scientists could pursue the chemical
synthesis
of agents for cancer treatment. Among the pioneers in this search were
Gertrude Belle Elion and George Hitchings.
In Pharmaceutical Innovation: Revolutionizing Human Health, Alexander Scriabine
summarizes the major avenues in the search for chemicals to treat cancer. In roughly
chronological order, they are:
Miscellaneous Cancer Drugs — cisplatin, paclitaxel, Intron-A,
Proleukin, angiostatin, endostatin
Not only does chemotherapy have a history, but each of the anticancer agents now in use has its
own history. Often many years and the work of disparate teams of researchers—and sometimes a
little luck—go into developing these modern medicines used to combat the second leading cause of
death in the United States—cancer.
For more information, at other Web sites...
The Chemotherapy and
Pharmacology Page — from the Guide to Internet Resources for Cancer, North of England
Children's Cancer Research Unit, Department of Child Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
UK.
The Reconstructors — be the drug
discoverer in this postapocalyptic sci-fi drug development game that lets you rediscover the
secrets of aspirin in a future world that has lost the knowledge of modern medicine, from Rice
University.