Chemical Heritage Foundation
Visit
Library
Staff
Donald and Mildred Othmer
Bolton Society
Museum
Exhibits
Visitor Information
Tours
About
Donors
Events
Awards
Brown Bag Lectures
Chao Symposium
First Fridays
Heritage Day
History Live
Innovation Day
Joseph Priestley Society
Philadelphia Science Festival
Science on Tap
Conference Center
Conference Rooms
Catering Menu
Floor Plans
Directions
Hotels
Discover
Collections
Search
Rare Books
Oral Histories
Archives
Photographs
Fine Art
Artifacts
Scientific Instruments
Media
Chemical Heritage Magazine
Distillations Podcast
Periodic Tabloid Blog
Transmutations
Newsletter
Bookstore
Institute
Programs
Staff
Online Resources
Chemistry in History
Women in Chemistry
Stories from the Field
Thanks to Chemistry
Conflicts in Chemistry
It’s Elemental
Chemistry Now
Life Sciences Foundation
Research
Policy Center
Mission
News and Events
Projects, Collections, & Exhibits
Oral History Program
Publications
Staff
Beckman Center
Celebrating 25 Years
Fellowships
Publications
Fellows and Staff
Former Fellows
Donors
Library Research
About
Online Catalog
Library Services
Schedule a Visit
About
Mailing List
Donate
Previous Issues
Subscribe
About
Contact
Advertising
Book Review: Getting the Lead Out
page 2 of 2
Previous
1
2
Next
James Whorton
Troesken carefully examines the medical community’s uncertainty during this period with respect to the threat of lead in water. Some physicians feared that consumers were being poisoned, but the majority were either skeptical or certain there was no danger. In most cases, after all, the poisoning produced was not acute but chronic, developing slowly and in the early stages easily mistaken for other complaints. Furthermore, physicians were focused on the health of adults, but children and fetuses were most at risk. Drinking water in many cities in Britain and the United States supplied dosages of lead capable of inducing abortion. This threat was recognized by some physicians by the early 1900s and was taken up by adherents of the eugenics movement as a hazard that threatened to bring about “race suicide.” There is also a compelling argument made that lead in water significantly increased the incidence of eclampsia in pregnancy.
As scientists and engineers came to better understand the nature of plumbism in the early 20th century, they took a range of government-mandated steps to lower the risk of poisoning from water pipes, including chemically treating water to inhibit lead solubility and replacing lead pipes with conduits made of safer materials. The gradual introduction of polyvinyl chloride (commonly known as
PVC
) pipes in the second half of the twentieth century finally got the lead out of most drinking water, though as Troesken notes in his concluding chapter, lead levels still exceed EPA standards in some districts in the United States.
Troesken’s book is based on extensive research in the chemical and medical literature, government publications, court cases, and newspaper stories, as well as statistical analysis not often encountered in historical studies. The narrative nicely blends chemistry with the political and economic forces that shaped decisions about water supply and is rich in illustrative anecdotes. The book would benefit from tighter organization, and more could be said on recent developments that have brought the problem under control. Nevertheless,
The Great Lead Water Pipe Disaster
is a valuable addition to our understanding of the chemical health hazards associated with modernization in Western society.
James Whorton is a professor of the history of medicine in the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
page 2 of 2
Previous
1
2
Next
E-mail
Print
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
This article appears in the Fall 2007 Edition.
All Fall 2007 Articles ›
People
First Lady
Serious Fun
Life in Translation
Writing Bug
Treasures
Calendar of Rain
Meeting the Miner’s Friend
Party Spirits
Positive Effect
Making History
Rocky Road
Dirty Business
To Dye For
Ready or Not
Reviews
Bright Light
Reading Genes
Great Scot!
Running on Empty