Chemical Heritage Foundation
Visit
Library
Staff
Donald and Mildred Othmer
Bolton Society
Museum
Exhibits
Visitor Information
Tours
About
Donors
Events
Awards
Brown Bag Lectures
Chao Symposium
First Fridays
Heritage Day
History Live
Innovation Day
Joseph Priestley Society
Philadelphia Science Festival
Science on Tap
Conference Center
Conference Rooms
Catering Menu
Floor Plans
Directions
Hotels
Discover
Collections
Search
Rare Books
Oral Histories
Archives
Photographs
Fine Art
Artifacts
Scientific Instruments
Media
Chemical Heritage Magazine
Distillations Podcast
Periodic Tabloid Blog
Transmutations
Newsletter
Bookstore
Institute
Programs
Staff
Online Resources
Chemistry in History
Women in Chemistry
Stories from the Field
Thanks to Chemistry
Conflicts in Chemistry
It’s Elemental
Chemistry Now
Life Sciences Foundation
Research
Policy Center
Mission
News and Events
Projects, Collections, & Exhibits
Oral History Program
Publications
Staff
Beckman Center
Celebrating 25 Years
Fellowships
Publications
Fellows and Staff
Former Fellows
Donors
Library Research
About
Online Catalog
Library Services
Schedule a Visit
About
Mailing List
Donate
Previous Issues
Subscribe
About
Contact
Advertising
The First Century of Chemical Engineering
page 2 of 3
Previous
1
2
3
Next
Nicholas A. Peppas
The Industrial Chemical Lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1893.
By the end of the 19th century, competition among Great Britain, Germany, and the United States for industrial chemicals had become rather fierce, and chemical engineering expertise was in high demand. The first course in chemical engineering was offered by an unknown industrial prospector from Manchester, England, named George E. Davis, who decided to transfer his vast knowledge from years of inspecting chemical plants in the industrial regions of England to the classroom. In fall 1887 he gave a series of 12 lectures that were later published in
Chemical Trade Journal
. The next year Lewis M. Norton (1855–1893) of the chemistry department of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) offered a new course in chemical engineering. The course material was taken predominantly from Norton’s notes on industrial practice in Germany, which at that time had probably the most advanced chemical process industry in the world.
When Norton died in 1893, Frank H. Thorpe (1864– 1932), an MIT graduate who had earned a doctorate from the University of Heidelberg that same year, took responsibility for Norton’s course. Five years later he published what may be considered the first textbook on chemical engineering, entitled
Outlines of Industrial Chemistry
. This textbook made mention of the chemical treatment of biological by-products, a very faint indication of early biotechnology processes.
Although Norton and Thorpe pioneered the teaching of chemical engineering in the United States, it was Arthur A. Noyes (1866–1936) and later William H. Walker (1869–1934) who helped bring to the discipline the respect it would eventually enjoy within the engineering curriculum. Noyes established the Research Laboratory of Physical Chemistry at MIT in 1903 before making his mark in 1913 by transforming what was then Throop College into the California Institute of Technology. Walker, who had received his doctorate in 1892 at the University of Göttingen with future Nobel laureate Otto Wallach, was hired as an instructor at MIT in 1902. Under Walker’s leadership, MIT’s Division of Applied Chemistry (as it was then known) flourished, and the establishment of its Research Laboratory of Applied Chemistry followed in 1908. In his institution-building work Walker was assisted by Warren K. Lewis (1882–1975), for whom the prestigious AIChE teaching and education award is named. He left a deep impact not only through his series of industrial consultancies and attempts at profession building, but also through his emphasis on practical teaching.
In England, during the same period, Davis proceeded with the publication of his
Handbook of Chemical Engineering
(1901), which was revised and published in a second edition of over 1,000 pages in 1904. Davis’s textbook was particularly important because it introduced the notion of “unit operations,” although the term itself would not be coined until 1915 by Arthur D. Little at MIT. As developed by the two men, “unit operations” referred to the idea that all chemical processes can be analyzed by dividing them into distinct operations, such as distillation, extraction, filtration, and crystallization, all of which are governed by certain principles. More than anything, however, Davis was responsible for coining the term
chemical engineering
to describe this new engineering area that addressed problems of the chemical industry.
In the United States, MIT is considered the first university to have offered, in 1888, a four-year curriculum in chemical engineering, in 1888. Other universities soon followed MIT’s example: the University of Pennsylvania (1894), Tulane University (1894), the University of Michigan (1898), and Tufts University (1898). Each of these four-year programs in chemical engineering were housed within the chemistry department.
The Institution of a Profession
In this climate of international competition and academic excitement the young field of chemical engineering found the right ground to thrive in. In 1903 a specialized publication appeared.
The Chemical Engineer
was not exactly a scientific journal, but it included practical articles written by practicing industrial chemists and engineers, including William Walker. By 1905 this magazine had a circulation of more than 1,600, including about 570 chemical engineers.
By 1904 tensions were bubbling up among members at American Chemical Society (ACS) meetings about the relationship between chemistry and chemical engineering. At that year’s meeting Hugo Schweitzer, a prominent New York industrial chemist, declared himself "absolutely against the introduction of chemical engineering in the education of chemists. ”In the same meeting M. T. Bogert agreed with Schweitzer, saying that progress in “technical chemistry” was best achieved in research laboratories by researchers without engineering training. But the engineers found a defender in Milton C. Whitaker, a professor of chemistry at Columbia University, who argued that a chemist was “generally not the man who is capable of transmitting from a laboratory to a factory the ideas which he has developed ”because he lacks education “in the engineering branches.”
page 2 of 3
Previous
1
2
3
Next
E-mail
Print
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
This article appears in the Fall 2008 Edition.
All Fall 2008 Articles ›
People
First Lady
Serious Fun
Life in Translation
Writing Bug
Treasures
Calendar of Rain
Meeting the Miner’s Friend
Party Spirits
Positive Effect
Making History
Rocky Road
Dirty Business
To Dye For
Ready or Not
Reviews
Bright Light
Reading Genes
Great Scot!
Running on Empty