Chemical Heritage Foundation
Visit
Library
Staff
Donald and Mildred Othmer
Bolton Society
Museum
Exhibits
Visitor Information
Tours
About
Donors
Events
Awards
Brown Bag Lectures
Chao Symposium
First Fridays
Heritage Day
History Live
Innovation Day
Joseph Priestley Society
Philadelphia Science Festival
Science on Tap
Conference Center
Conference Rooms
Catering Menu
Floor Plans
Directions
Hotels
Discover
Collections
Search
Rare Books
Oral Histories
Archives
Photographs
Fine Art
Artifacts
Scientific Instruments
Media
Chemical Heritage Magazine
Distillations Podcast
Periodic Tabloid Blog
Transmutations
Newsletter
Bookstore
Institute
Programs
Staff
Online Resources
Chemistry in History
Women in Chemistry
Stories from the Field
Thanks to Chemistry
Conflicts in Chemistry
It’s Elemental
Chemistry Now
Life Sciences Foundation
Research
Policy Center
Mission
News and Events
Projects, Collections, & Exhibits
Oral History Program
Publications
Staff
Beckman Center
Celebrating 25 Years
Fellowships
Publications
Fellows and Staff
Former Fellows
Donors
Library Research
About
Online Catalog
Library Services
Schedule a Visit
About
Mailing List
Donate
Previous Issues
Subscribe
About
Contact
Advertising
The First Century of Chemical Engineering
page 3 of 3
Previous
1
2
3
Next
Nicholas A. Peppas
The Industrial Chemical Lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1893.
The controversy soon spurred action. Three years later a group of 12 chemists and engineers met at the Chalfonte Hotel in Atlantic City to discuss the future of their profession. At the end of their discussion they formed the so-called Committee of Six to explore the “possibility of forming a chemical engineering organization.” The Committee of Six represented the core of what would become AIChE’s leadership, which included Walker as well as three men who would go on to become presidents of the organization: Arthur D. Little (1919), Charles F. McKenna (1910), and John C. Olsen (1931). Discussions continued for almost six months after the meeting, but it was finally decided that an organizational meeting was the next step.
The Committee of Six, joined by 15 other chemists and chemical engineers, held its next meeting in January 1908 at the Belmont Hotel in New York. Once again Bogert, by this time president of the ACS, raised the objection that his organization already served the needs of practicing industrial chemists. Nevertheless, the Committee of Six stood firm and decided to form a new organization dedicated to chemical engineering. On 22 June 1908 the first meeting of the AIChE convened at the Engineer’s Club of Philadelphia. According to minutes recorded by William Meade, “enthusiasm ran high” among the 40 men in attendance.
As originally envisioned, one of the primary goals of AIChE was to raise the professional status of the 500 or so chemical engineers then working in American factories and chemical manufacturing plants. Partly as a way to placate the ACS and partly in an attempt to make membership exclusive—and therefore prestigious—the AIChE initially adopted strict membership requirements: members had to be at least 30 years old, be currently engaged in “applied” chemistry, and have either 5 or 10 years of industrial experience, depending on whether the applicant held a science degree. These requirements kept membership small (well under 1,000) through the first two decades of the organization’s existence.
In those days the training of chemical engineers was a subject of much debate in AIChE meetings. Whitaker, an influential professor of chemical engineering at Columbia University and an early president of AIChE (1914), expressed his views on the training of chemical engineers as follows: “The chemical engineer works in the organization, operation, and management of existing or proposed processes with a view to building up a successful manufacturing industry . . . His fundamental training in chemistry, physics, mathematics, etc., must be thorough and must be combined with a natural engineering inclination and an acquired knowledge of engineering methods and appliances.” He continued by giving a description of the types of courses that should be taught, which he classified as courses for “fundamental training” (chemistry, physics, mathematics), “associated training” (electrical, mechanical, civil, and general engineering, and business economics), and “supplementary training” (laboratory and administration courses). For Whitaker it was important that a distinction be made between the education of a chemical engineer and that of an industrial chemist. The chemical engineer would study both chemical processes and unit operations, while the industrial chemist traditionally learned specific procedures for producing bulk quantities of feedstock chemicals. His views affected his graduate students, prominent among whom was Eugene E. Leslie, who would later teach at the University of Michigan.
Over the course of the 20th century, chemical engineering gradually developed a specific disciplinary identity, focusing first on unit operations, then adding applied thermodynamics, chemical-reaction engineering, applied mathematics, and computer science. By the mid-1970s, researchers realized that chemical engineers could contribute significantly to areas outside of the core of classical chemical engineering, including interdisciplinary areas such as the biochemical and biomedical sciences and materials science. Today chemical engineers are leading the way in sustainability, nanotechnology, high-performance materials, and electronics manufacturing.
The establishment of AIChE in 1908 gave shape to the dreams of the “converted chemists” who were calling themselves chemical engineers in the face of opposition from employers as well as professional colleagues. After a century of growth AIChE is unquestionably the world’s leading organization for chemical engineers, with more than 40,000 members in more than 90 countries and more than 100 local sections. Now, in the beginning of the 21st century, chemical engineers’ contributions remain critical not only to the global economy, but also to modern life.
Nicholas A. Peppas is Fletcher Stuckey Pratt Chair in Engineering at the University of Texas.
page 3 of 3
Previous
1
2
3
Next
E-mail
Print
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
This article appears in the Fall 2008 Edition.
All Fall 2008 Articles ›
People
First Lady
Serious Fun
Life in Translation
Writing Bug
Treasures
Calendar of Rain
Meeting the Miner’s Friend
Party Spirits
Positive Effect
Making History
Rocky Road
Dirty Business
To Dye For
Ready or Not
Reviews
Bright Light
Reading Genes
Great Scot!
Running on Empty