Chemical Heritage Foundation
Home Search Site Map Press Room Contact Us Website Manager
 About CHF  Helping CHF
Explore Chemical History  Collections & Exhibits  Library  CHF Publications  Classroom Resources  Research & Fellowships  Events & Activities
 Chemical Heritage Newsmagazine
Publications Catalog
Chemical Heritage Newsmagazine

Current Issue

 Back Issues
 Letters to the Editor
 Subscribe
 Submission Guidelines
 Advertise in CH
Podcast & Blogs
Online Publications
How can I help CHF?
Joseph Priestley: Public Intellectual Page 1 2 3 4 5
Pneumatic trough apparatus, Joseph Priestley
This plate from the French translation of Priestley’s Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Airs shows the apparatus associated with the pneumatic trough that Priestley had adopted from earlier pneumatic researchers. Roy G. Neville Historical Chemical Library, CHF. Photo by Gregory Tobias.

Priestley’s Career in England

After Priestley left the Daventry Dissenting Academy, his career took him to many parts of England, as he was “called” from one religious community to another as preacher and teacher. Not all his posts were successful: his first one in a rural community in Suffolk he called “a low, despised situation,” and his fierce Unitarian views were too much for his congregation, which, together with his income, dwindled. But from time to time he was able to slip into nearby Cambridge, and he started to teach science to his parishioners, building up a collection of scientific apparatus. He transferred to Nantwich, home of the salt industry, and then to Warrington, where he began serious teaching at the newly established academy. Priestley’s remarkably polymathic abilities are clearly shown by his syllabus for 1762, which announces that for that year he will teach Latin and Greek language and antiquities, French, English grammar, oratory, history, logic, and anatomy. And it was in the same year that he published A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. A year later he started teaching chemistry, and it was not long before he started his own researches.

But his major concern was static electricity; we must remember that the electric cell was not invented by Alessandro Volta until the end of Priestley’s life. Priestley repeated earlier experiments and incorporated his own, publishing the substantial volume The History and Present State of Electricity, with Original Experiments in 1767. He had already been awarded an honorary doctorate by Edinburgh University for his educational activity, and he was made a fellow of the Royal Society in 1766. So at the young age of 33, his potential, if not actual, achievements had been recognized.

Priestley’s moves from one appointment to another read almost as a travel itinerary. After six years at Warrington, he moved to Leeds, a Yorkshire center of the wool industry that would burgeon into one of the great industrial cities of northern England. Here Priestley conceived the development of a major work, starting with the electricity volume, which he intended to expand into an encyclopedia of all known physical science. This he was to call The History of All Branches of Experimental Philosophy. His next volume was on optics: History and Present State of Discoveries relating to Vision, Light and Colours, and this was followed by what was his greatest scientific achievement in print, six volumes of his chemical studies, called Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Airs, published between 1774 and 1786. These volumes describe, among other things, his experiments on gases, including his discovery of oxygen, which he stubbornly considered to be dephlogisticated air.

It is difficult for us to enter the mind-set of the experimenter of this time. Gases were by no means understood as distinct chemical substances, with distinct properties, let alone as being made of distinct chemical components. Though it had been appreciated that gases with different colors and smells existed, this variety was ascribed to there being a single gas, called air, in different states of purity. It was not until the Edinburgh medical student Joseph Black chemically characterized carbon dioxide, which he called fixed air, in 1754, that the realization occurred that different gases were in fact different chemical substances. Priestley occupied himself furiously with developing an understanding of gases, working on a greater range of them than anybody else.

Priestley was deeply occupied with his pastoral duties in Leeds as well as with his science. But because he wanted to concentrate on his researches, he leapt at the opportunity to leave the north of England to go to lucrative work as librarian and intellectual companion to a radical member of the aristocracy, the Earl of Shelburne, at his great country seat of Shelburne, in Wiltshire. Here, in the Diocletian wing built by Robert Adam, Priestley conducted the famous experiment of heating mercury by focusing the rays of the sun on its surface to produce a calx, then reversing the reaction by applying a higher temperature, to produce what we call oxygen. In 1774 Priestley and his master went on a tour of Flanders, Germany, and France, and he met Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier and described his seminal experiment to him. I will not go into the complexities of who first discovered oxygen, and indeed to insist on a discoverer misleads as much as it reveals. Suffice it to say that Priestley first made and described “dephlogisticated air,” though he was never able to believe in oxygen and opposed Lavoisier’s ideas to the end. Concerning chemical structure, he revealed particular prescience when he wrote: “What peculiar excellence is there in those particles of matter which compose my body, more than those which compose the table on which I write? . . . If I knew that they were instantly, and without any painful sensation to myself, to change places, I do not think it would give me any concern.” But such attitudes certainly concerned those who held more traditional religious beliefs about the nature of man.

In 1780 Priestley left his rural interlude at Bowood, this time for Birmingham and a chapel called the New Meeting. Friends and admirers enabled him to build a laboratory and library, and together with his theology and literary obsessions, he continued his program of scientific research, notably on the composition of water, which was of consuming interest to a number of his contemporaries. The industrial nature of Birmingham encouraged him to consider such practical problems as the composition of iron and steel and the nature of acids. There happened to be a remarkable grouping of intellectuals in the city at the time, and together they met once a month for discourse at the Lunar Society, so named because the day of their meeting was always the night when there was a full moon. It was said that the moonlight helped them make their way home afterwards. One can scarcely imagine the scene, with James Watt, Matthew Boulton, Erasmus Darwin, William Withering, Josiah Wedgwood, and Priestley himself staggering away by moonlight following their fulsome conversation and drink.

Voltaic pile; jasperware portrait of Joseph Priestley
Tradition holds that Alessandro Volta, who invented the voltaic pile in 1800, sent this instrument to Priestley. Courtesy of the Archives and Special Collections, Dickinson College. Photo by Gregory Tobias.
This jasperware portrait medallion of Priestley from the late 1700s represents the close relations between members of the Lunar Society. It was made in member Josiah Wedgwood’s factory, Etruria, the first ceramic factory to install a steam-powered engine, which was manufactured by Lunar Society members Matthew Boulton and James Watt. Courtesy of the Edgar Fahs Smith Memorial Collection, University of Pennsylvania Library. Photo by Gregory Tobias.
The History and Present State of Electricity, Joseph Priestley
Priestley wrote The History and Present State of Electricity, with Original Experiments, with the encouragement and support of Benjamin Franklin. Plate VII shows Priestley’s own design for a machine to generate electrical charges. Roy G. Neville Historical Chemical Library, CHF. Photo by Gregory Tobias.

  © 2005 Chemical Heritage Foundation