Panaceia’s Daughters: Noblewomen as Healers in Early Modern Germany
Panaceia’s Daughters provides the first book-length study of noblewomen’s healing activities in early modern Europe. Drawing on rich archival sources, Alisha Rankin demonstrates that numerous German noblewomen were deeply involved in making medicines and recommending them to patients, and many gained widespread fame for their remedies.
Turning a common historical argument on its head, Rankin maintains that noblewomen’s pharmacy came to prominence not in spite of their gender but because of it. Rankin demonstrates the ways in which noblewomen’s pharmacy was bound up in notions of charity, class, religion, and household roles, as well as in expanding networks of knowledge and early forms of scientific experimentation. The opening chapters place noblewomen’s healing within the context of cultural exchange, experiential knowledge, and the widespread search for medicinal recipes in early modern Europe.
Read about Rankin’s experience researching for Panaceia’s Daughters in her blog post Writing Recipes Down.
Case studies of renowned healers Dorothea of Mansfeld and Anna of Saxony then demonstrate the value their pharmacy held in their respective roles as elderly widow and royal consort, while a study of the long-suffering Duchess Elisabeth of Rochlitz emphasizes the importance of experiential knowledge and medicinal remedies to the patient’s experience of illness.
About the Author
Alisha Rankin is an assistant professor of history at Tufts University. She received her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 2005 and her B.A. from Wellesley College in 1996. Her broad research interests include early modern European history (c. 1450–1700), the history of science and medicine, and women’s history. Along with Panaceia’s Daughters, her first book, she has also coedited a collection of essays titled Secrets and Knowledge in Medicine and Science, 1500–1800.
“This book demonstrates that kitchen gardens, still rooms, recipes, and household arts should not be relegated to the margins but, rather, placed squarely within the history of the scientific revolution.”—Pamela H. Smith, Columbia University